Solaris 10: ZFS Evil Tuning Guide
ZFS Evil Tuning Guide
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Limiting_the_ARC_Cache
From Siwiki
Overview
Tuning is Evil
Tuning is often evil and should rarely be done.
First, consider that the default values are set by the people who know the most about the effects of the tuning on the software that they supply. If a better value exists, it should be the default. While alternative values might help a given workload, it could quite possibly degrade some other aspects of performance. Occasionally, catastrophically so.
Over time, tuning recommendations might become stale at best or might lead to performance degradations. Customers are leery of changing a tuning that is in place and the net effect is a worse product than what it could be. Moreover, tuning enabled on a given system might spread to other systems, where it might not be warranted at all.
Nevertheless, it is understood that customers who carefully observe their own system may understand aspects of their workloads that cannot be anticipated by the defaults. In such cases, the tuning information below may be applied, provided that one works to carefully understand its effects.
If you must implement a ZFS tuning parameter, please reference the URL of this document:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide
Review ZFS Best Practices Guide
On the other hand, ZFS best practices are things we encourage people to use. They are a set of recommendations that have been shown to work in different environments and are expected to keep working in the foreseeable future. So, before turning to tuning, make sure you’ve read and understood the best practices around deploying a ZFS environment that are described here:
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
Identify ZFS Tuning Changes
The syntax for enabling a given tuning recommendation has changed over the life of ZFS releases. So, when upgrading to newer releases, make sure that the tuning recommendations are still effective. If you decide to use a tuning recommendation, reference this page in the /etc/system file or in the associated script.
The Tunables
In no particular order:
Tuning ZFS Checksums
End-to-end checksumming is one of the great features of ZFS. It allows ZFS to detect and correct many kinds of errors other products can’t detect and correct. Disabling checksum is, of course, a very bad idea. Having file system level checksums enabled can alleviate the need to have application level checksums enabled. In this case, using the ZFS checksum becomes a performance enabler.
The checksums are computed asynchronously to most application processing and should normally not be an issue. However, each pool currently has a single thread computing the checksums (RFE below) and it’s possible for that computation to limit pool throughput. So, if disk count is very large (>> 10) or single CPU is weak (< Ghz), then this tuning might help. If a system is close to CPU saturated, the checksum computations might become noticeable. In those cases, do a run with checksums off to verify if checksum calculation is a problem.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Tuning_ZFS_Checksums
Verify the type of checksum used:
zfs get checksum <filesystem>
Tuning is achieved dynamically by using:
zfs set checksum=off <filesystem>
And reverted:
zfs set checksum=’on | fletcher2 | fletcher4 | sha256′ <filesystem>
Fletcher2 checksum (the default) has been observed to consume roughly 1Ghz of a CPU when checksumming 500 MByte per second.
RFEs
- 6533726 single-threaded checksum & raidz2 parity calculations limit write bandwidth on thumper (Fixed in Nevada, build 79 and Solaris 10 10/08)
Limiting the ARC Cache
The ARC is where ZFS caches data from all active storage pools. The ARC grows and consumes memory on the principle that no need exists to return data to the system while there is still plenty of free memory. When the ARC has grown and outside memory pressure exists, for example, when a new application starts up, then the ARC releases its hold on memory. ZFS is not designed to steal memory from applications. A few bumps appeared along the way, but the established mechanism works reasonably well for many situations and does not commonly warrant tuning.
However, review the following situations:
- If a future memory requirement is significantly large and well defined, then it can be advantageous to prevent ZFS from growing the ARC into it. For example, if we know that a future application requires 20% of memory, it makes sense to cap the ARC such that it does not consume more than the remaining 80% of memory.
- If the application is a known consumer of large memory pages, then again limiting the ARC prevents ZFS from breaking up the pages and fragmenting the memory. Limiting the ARC preserves the availability of large pages.
- If dynamic reconfiguration of a memory board is needed (supported on certain platforms), then it is a requirement to prevent the ARC (and thus the kernel cage) to grow onto all boards.
- If an application’s demand for memory fluctuates, the ZFS ARC caches data at a period of weak demand and then shrinks at a period of strong demand. However, on large memory systems, ZFS does not shrink below the value of arc_c_min or currently, at approximately 12% of memory. If an application’s height of memory usage requires more than 88% of system memory, tuning arc_c_min would be currently required until a better default is selected as part of 6855793.
For theses cases, you might consider limiting the ARC. Limiting the ARC will, of course, also limit the amount of cached data and this can have adverse effects on performance. No easy way exists to foretell if limiting the ARC degrades performance.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Limiting_the_ARC_Cache
Current Solaris 10 Releases and Solaris Nevada Releases
This syntax is provided starting in the Solaris 10 8/07 release and Nevada (build 51) release.
For example, if an application needs 5 GBytes of memory on a system with 36-GBytes of memory, you could set the arc maximum to 30 GBytes, (0x780000000 or 32212254720 bytes). Set the zfs:zfs_arc_max parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfs_arc_max = 0x780000000
or
set zfs:zfs_arc_max = 32212254720
Earlier Solaris Releases
You can only change the ARC maximum size by using the mdb command. Because the system is already booted, the ARC init routine has already executed and other ARC size parameters have already been set based on the default c_max size. Therefore, you should tune the arc.c and arc.p values, along with arc.c_max, using the formula:
arc.c = arc.c_max
arc.p = arc.c / 2
For example, to the set the ARC parameters to small values, such as arc_c_max to 512MB, and complying with the formula above (arc.c_max to 512MB, and arc.p to 256MB), use the following syntax:
# mdb -kw > arc::print -a p c c_max ffffffffc00b3260 p = 0xb75e46ff ffffffffc00b3268 c = 0x11f51f570 ffffffffc00b3278 c_max = 0x3bb708000 > ffffffffc00b3260/Z 0x10000000 ffffffffc00b3260: 0xb75e46ff = 0x10000000 > ffffffffc00b3268/Z 0x20000000 ffffffffc00b3268: 0x11f51f570 = 0x20000000 > ffffffffc00b3278/Z 0x20000000 ffffffffc00b3278: 0x11f51f570 = 0x20000000
You should verify the values have been set correctly by examining them again in mdb (using the same print command in the example). You can also monitor the actual size of the ARC to ensure it has not exceeded:
# echo "arc::print -d size" | mdb -k
The above command displays the current ARC size in decimal.
You can also use the arcstat script available at http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/entry/zfs_arc_statistics to check the arc size as well as other arc statistics
Here is a perl script that you can call from an init script to configure your ARC on boot with the above guidelines:
#!/bin/perl
use strict;
my $arc_max = shift @ARGV;
if ( !defined($arc_max) ) {
print STDERR "usage: arc_tune <arc max>n";
exit -1;
}
$| = 1;
use IPC::Open2;
my %syms;
my $mdb = "/usr/bin/mdb";
open2(*READ, *WRITE, "$mdb -kw") || die "cannot execute mdb";
print WRITE "arc::print -an";
while(<READ>) {
my $line = $_;
if ( $line =~ /^ +([a-f0-9]+) (.*) =/ ) {
$syms{$2} = $1;
} elsif ( $line =~ /^}/ ) {
last;
}
}
# set c & c_max to our max; set p to max/2
printf WRITE "%s/Z 0x%xn", $syms{p}, ( $arc_max / 2 );
print scalar <READ>;
printf WRITE "%s/Z 0x%xn", $syms{c}, $arc_max;
print scalar <READ>;
printf WRITE "%s/Z 0x%xn", $syms{c_max}, $arc_max;
print scalar <READ>;
RFEs
- 6488341 ZFS should avoiding growing the ARC into trouble (Fixed in Nevada, build 107)
- 6522017 The ARC allocates memory inside the kernel cage, preventing DR
- 6424665 ZFS/ARC should cleanup more after itself
- 6429205 Each zpool needs to monitor it’s throughput and throttle heavy writers (Fixed in Nevada, build 87 and Solaris 10 10/08) For more information, see this link: New ZFS write throttle
- 6855793 ZFS minimum ARC size might be too large
Further Reading
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/does_zfs_really_use_more
http://blogs.sun.com/realneel/entry/zfs_arc_statistics
File-Level Prefetching
ZFS implements a file-level prefetching mechanism labeled zfetch. This mechanism looks at the patterns of reads to files, and anticipates on some reads, reducing application wait times. The current code needs attention (RFE below) and suffers from 2 drawbacks:
- Sequential read patterns made of small reads very often hit in the cache. In this case, the current code consumes a significant amount of CPU time trying to find the next I/O to issue, whereas performance is governed more by the CPU availability.
- The zfetch code has been observed to limit scalability of some loads.
So, if CPU profiling, by using lockstat(1M) with -I argument or er_kernel as described here:
http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/articles/perftools.html
shows significant time in zfetch_* functions, or if lock profiling (lockstat(1m)) shows contention around zfetch locks, then disabling file level prefetching should be considered.
Disabling prefetching can be achieved dynamically or through a setting in the /etc/system file.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#File-Level_Prefetching
Current Solaris 10 Releases and Solaris Nevada Releases
This syntax is provided starting in the Solaris 10 8/07 release and Solaris Nevada build 51 release.
Set dynamically:
echo zfs_prefetch_disable/W0t1 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zfs_prefetch_disable/W0t0 | mdb -kw
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfs_prefetch_disable = 1
Earlier Solaris Releases
Set dynamically:
echo zfetch_array_rd_sz/Z0x0 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zfetch_array_rd_sz/Z0x100000 | mdb -kw
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfetch_array_rd_sz = 0
RFEs
- 6412053 zfetch needs some love
- 6579975 dnode_new_blkid should first check as RW_READER (Fixed in Nevada, build 97)
Device-Level Prefetching
ZFS does device-level read-ahead in addition to file-level prefetching. When ZFS reads a block from a disk, it inflates the I/O size, hoping to pull interesting data or metadata from the disk. This data is stored in a 10MB LRU per-vdev cache which can short-cut the ZIO pipeline if present in cache.
Prior to the Solaris Nevada build snv_70, the code caused problems for system with lots of disks because the extra prefetched data could cause congestion on the channel between the storage and the host. Tuning down the size by which I/O was inflated () had been effective for OLTP type loads in the past. However, fixed by bug 6437054, the code is now only prefetching metadata and this is not expected to require any tuning.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Device-Level_Prefetching
No tuning is required for Solaris Nevada releases, build 70 and after.
Solaris 10 (up to Solaris 10 5/08) and Nevada (up to build 70) Releases
Setting this tunable might only be appropriate in the Solaris 10 8/07 and Solaris 10 5/08 releases and Nevada releases from build 53 to build 69.
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfs_vdev_cache_bshift = 13
/* Comments /* Setting zfs_vdev_cache_bshift with mdb crashes a system. /* zfs_vdev_cache_bshift is the base 2 logarithm of the size used to read disks. /* The default value of 16 means reads are issued in size of 1 << 16 = 64K. /* A value of 13 means disk reads are padded to 8K.
For earlier releases, see: http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/tuning_the_knobs
RFEs
- 6437054 vdev_cache wises up: increase DB performance by 16% (Fixed in Nevada, build 70 and Solaris 10 10/08)
Further Reading
http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/vdev_cache_improvements_to_help
Device I/O Queue Size (I/O Concurrency)
ZFS controls the I/O queue depth for a given LUN. The default is 35, which allows common SCSI and SATA disks to reach their maximum throughput under ZFS. However, having 35 concurrent I/Os means that the service times can be inflated. For NVRAM-based storage, it is not expected that this 35-deep queue is reached nor plays a significant role. Tuning this parameter for NVRAM-based storage is expected to be ineffective. For JBOD-type storage, tuning this parameter is expected to help response times at the expense of raw streaming throughput.
The Solaris Nevada release now has the option of storing the ZIL on separate devices from the main pool. Using separate intent log devices can alleviate the need to tune this parameter for loads that are synchronously write intensive.
If you tune this parmeter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
Tuning is not expected to be effective for NVRAM-based storage arrays.
Solaris 10 8/07 Release and Solaris Nevada (snv_53 to snv_69) Release
Set dynamically:
echo zfs_vdev_max_pending/W0t10 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zfs_vdev_max_pending/W0t35 | mdb -kw
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfs_vdev_max_pending = 10
For earlier Solaris releases, see:
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/tuning_the_knobs
Device Driver Considerations
Device drivers may also limit the number of outstanding I/Os per LUN. If you are using LUNs on storage arrays that can handle large numbers of concurrent IOPS, then the device driver constraints can limit concurrency. Consult the configuration for the drivers your system uses. For example, the limit for the QLogic ISP2200, ISP2300, and SP212 family FCl HBA (qlc) driver is described as the execution-throttle parameter in /kernel/drv/qlc.conf.
RFEs
- 6471212 need reserved I/O scheduler slots to improve I/O latency of critical ops
Further Reading
http://blogs.sun.com/perrin/entry/slog_blog_or_blogging_on
Cache Flushes
If you’ve noticed terrible NFS or database performance on SAN storage array, the problem is not with ZFS, but with the way the disk drivers interact with the storage devices.
ZFS is designed to work with storage devices that manage a disk-level cache. ZFS commonly asks the storage device to ensure that data is safely placed on stable storage by requesting a cache flush. For JBOD storage, this works as designed and without problems. For many NVRAM-based storage arrays, a problem might come up if the array takes the cache flush request and actually does something rather than ignoring it. Some storage will flush their caches despite the fact that the NVRAM protection makes those caches as good as stable storage.
ZFS issues infrequent flushes (every 5 second or so) after the uberblock updates. The problem here is fairly inconsequential. No tuning is warranted here.
ZFS also issues a flush every time an application requests a synchronous write (O_DSYNC, fsync, NFS commit, and so on). The completion of this type of flush is waited upon by the application and impacts performance. Greatly so, in fact. From a performance standpoint, this neutralizes the benefits of having an NVRAM-based storage.
Tuning the Write Caches
Starting in the Solaris 10 5/09 release, ZFS is better able to adapt to characteristics of SAN storage devoces and some of you will not experience any problem with ZFS. For example, we know that Hitachi Data System (HDS) storage devices with up-to-date firmware fall in this category.
If you experimentally observe that setting zfs_nocacheflush with mdb to have a dramatic effect on performance, such as a 5 times or more difference for small file tar extracts over NFS, then this indicates your storage is not friendly to ZFS.
Contact you storage vendor for instructions on how to tell the storage devices to ignore the cache flushes sent by ZFS. For Santricity based storage devices, instructions are documented in CR 6578220.
If you are not able to configure the storage device in an appropriate way, the preferred mechanism is to tune sd.conf specifically for your storage. See the instructions below.
As a last resort, when all LUNs exposed to ZFS come from NVRAM-protected storage array and procedures ensure that no unprotected LUNs will be added in the future, ZFS can be tuned to not issue the flush requests by setting zfs_nocacheflush. If some LUNs exposed to ZFS are not protected by NVRAM, then this tuning can lead to data loss, application level corruption, or even pool corruption. In some NVRAM-protected storage arrays, the cache flush command is a no-op, so tuning in this situation makes no performance difference.
NOTE: Cache flushing is commonly done as part of the ZIL operations. While disabling cache flushing can, at times, make sense, disabling the ZIL does not.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Cache_Flushes
NOTE: If you are carrying forward an /etc/system file, please verify that any changes made still apply to your current release. Help us rid the world of /etc/system viruses.
How to Tune Cache Sync Handling Per Storage Device
Since ZFS is not aware of the nature of the storage and if NVRAM is present, the best way to fix this issue is to tell the storage to ignore the requests.
A recent fix is that the flush request semantic has been qualified to instruct storage devices to ignore the requests if they have the proper protection. This change required a fix to our disk drivers and for the storage to support the updated semantics.
If the storage device does not recognize this improvement, here are instructions to tell the Solaris OS not to send any synchronize cache commands to the array. If you use these instructions, make sure all targetted LUNS are indeed protected by NVRAM.
Caution: All cache sync commands are ignored by the device. Use at your own risk.
- Use the format utilty to run the inquiry subcommand on a LUN from the storage array. For example:
# format . . . Specify disk (enter its number): x format> inquiry Vendor: ATA Product: Super Duper Revision: XXXX format>
- Select one of the following based on your architecture:
- ssd driver (many SPARC FC drivers): Add similar lines to the /kernel/drv/ssd.conf file
ssd-config-list = "ATA Super Duper ", "nvcache1"; nvcache1=1, 0x40000,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1;
- sd driver (X64 and a few SPARC FC drivers): Add similar lines to the /kernel/drv/sd.conf file
sd-config-list = "ATA Super Duper ", "nvcache1"; nvcache1=1, 0x40000,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1;
Note: In the above examples, nvcache1 is just a token in sd.conf. You could use any similar token.
- Add whitespace to make the vendor ID (VID) 8 characters long (here “ATA “) and Product ID (PID) 16 characters long (here “Super Duper “) in the sd-config-list entry as illustrated above.
- After the sd.conf or ssd.conf modifications and reboot, you can tune zfs_nocacheflush back to it’s default value (of 0) with no adverse effect on performance.
For more cache tuning resource information, see:
http://blogs.digitar.com/jjww/?itemid=44.
http://forums.hds.com/index.php?showtopic=497.
Current Solaris 10 Releases and Solaris Nevada Releases
Starting in the Solaris 10 5/08 release and Solaris Nevada build 72 release, the sd and ssd drivers should properly handle the SYNC_NV bit, so no changes should be needed.
Solaris 10 11/06 and Solaris Nevada (snv_52) Releases
Set dynamically:
echo zfs_nocacheflush/W0t1 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zfs_nocacheflush/W0t0 | mdb -kw
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfs_nocacheflush = 1
Risk: Some storage might revert to working like a JBOD disk when their battery is low, for instance. Disabling the caches can have adverse effects here. Check with your storage vendor.
Earlier Solaris Releases
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zil_noflush = 1
Set dynamically:
echo zil_noflush/W0t1 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zil_noflush/W0t0 | mdb -kw
Risk: Some storage might revert to working like a JBOD disk when their battery is low, for instance. Disabling the caches can have adverse effects here. Check with your storage vendor.
RFEs
- 6462690 sd driver should set SYNC_NV bit when issuing SYNCHRONIZE CACHE to SBC-2 devices (Fixed in Nevada, build 74 and Solaris 10 5/08)
- 6460889 zil shouldn’t send write-cache-flush command to busted devices
Disabling the ZIL (Don’t)
ZIL stands for ZFS Intent Log. It is used during synchronous writes operations. The ZIL is an essential part of ZFS and should never be disabled. Significant performance gains can be achieved by not having the ZIL, but that would be at the expense of data integrity. One can be infinitely fast, if correctness is not required.
One reason to disable the ZIL is to check if a given workload is significantly impacted by it. A little while ago, a workload that was a heavy consumer of ZIL operations was shown to not be impacted by disabling the ZIL. It convinced us to look elsewhere for improvements. If the ZIL is shown to be a factor in the performance of a workload, more investigation is necessary to see if the ZIL can be improved.
The OpenSolaris 2008 releases, Solaris 10 10/08 release, and Solaris Nevada build 68 or later release has the option of storing the ZIL on separate log devices from the main pool. Using separate possibly low latency devices for the Intent Log is a great way to improve ZIL sensitive loads. This feature is not currently supported on a root pool.
In general, negative ZIL performance impacts are worse on storage devices which have high write latency. HDD write latency is on the order of 10-20 ms. Many hardware RAID arrays have nonvolatile write caches where the write latency can be on the order of 1-10 ms. SSDs have write latency on the order of 0.2 ms. As the write latency decreases, the negative performance affects are diminished, which is why using an SSD as a separate ZIL log is a good thing. For hardware RAID arrays with nonvolatile cache, the decision to use a separate log device is less clear. YMMV.
The size of the separate log device may be quite small. A rule of thumb is that you should size the separate log to be able to handle 10 seconds of your expected synchronous write workload. It would be rare to need more than 100 MBytes in a separate log device, but the separate log must be at least 64 MBytes.
Caution: Disabling the ZIL on an NFS server can lead to client side corruption. The ZFS pool integrity itself is not compromised by this tuning.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Disabling_the_ZIL_.28Don.27t.29
Current Solaris Releases
If you must, then:
echo zil_disable/W0t1 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zil_disable/W0t0 | mdb -kw
Note!: The zil_disable tunable is only evaluated during dataset mount. While this can be tuned dynamically, to reap the benefits you must zfs umount and then zfs mount (or reboot, or export/import the pool, etc).
RFEs
- 6280630 zil synchronicity
Further Reading
http://blogs.sun.com/perrin/entry/slog_blog_or_blogging_on http://blogs.sun.com/erickustarz/entry/zil_disable http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine
Disabling Metadata Compression
Caution: This tuning needs to be researched as it’s now apparent that the tunable applies only to indirect blocks leaving a lot of metadata compressed anyway.
With ZFS, compression of data blocks is under the control of the file system administrator and can be turned on or off by using the command “zfs set compression …”.
On the other hand, ZFS internal metadata is always compressed on disk, by default. For metadata intensive loads, this default is expected to gain some amount of space (a few percentages) at the expense of a little extra CPU computation. However, a bigger motivation exists to have metadata compression on. For directories that grow to millions of objects then shrink to just a few, metadata compression saves large amounts of space (>>10X).
In general, metadata compression can be left as is. If your workload is CPU intensive (say > 80% load) and kernel profiling shows medata compression is a significant contributor and we are not expected to create and shrink huge directories, then disabling metadata compression can be attempted with the goal of providing more CPU to handle the workload.
If you tune this parameter, please reference this URL in shell script or in an /etc/system comment.
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide#Disabling_Metadata_Compression
Current Solaris 10 Releases and Solaris Nevada Releases
This syntax is available starting in the Solaris 10 11/06 release and Solaris Nevada build 52 release.
Set dynamically:
echo zfs_mdcomp_disable/W0t1 | mdb -kw
Revert to default:
echo zfs_mdcomp_disable/W0t0 | mdb -kw
Set the following parameter in the /etc/system file:
set zfs:zfs_mdcomp_disable = 1
Earlier Solaris Releases
Not tunable.
RFEs
- 6391873 metadata compression should be turned back on (Fixed in Nevada, build 36)
Additional ZFS References
- ZFS Best Practices
http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Best_Practices_Guide
- ZFS Dynamics
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/the_dynamics_of_zfs
- ZFS Links
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/links/
- Er_kernel profiling
http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/articles/perftools.html
- ZFS and Database/OLTP
- ZFS and NFS
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/nfs_and_zfs_a_fine
- ZFS and Direct I/O
http://blogs.sun.com/roch/entry/zfs_and_directio
- ZFS Separate Intent Log (SLOG)
http://blogs.sun.com/perrin/entry/slog_blog_or_blogging_on
Integrated RFEs that introduced or changed tunables
- snv_51 : 6477900 want more /etc/system tunables for ZFS performance analysis
- snv_52 : 6485204 more tuneable tweakin
- snv_53 : 6472021 vdev knobs can not be tuned
