<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for The Solaris Cookbook	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/</link>
	<description>The Cookbook and reference for IT Admins</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 14:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by Andreas Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-436&quot;&gt;Andreas Schmidt&lt;/a&gt;.

never mind ^^^^ silly comment. there is no rancherOS for LXC. So you would be right that Alpine may be the best / most performant solution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-436">Andreas Schmidt</a>.</p>
<p>never mind ^^^^ silly comment. there is no rancherOS for LXC. So you would be right that Alpine may be the best / most performant solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by Andreas Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 13:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-435&quot;&gt;c.monty&lt;/a&gt;.

In theory yes I agree. You could also go straight into RacherOS which is supposed to be also very low in footprint. 

I use Ubuntu/Debian as base mostly cause those are my preferred flavors and I know in and out how to manage them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-435">c.monty</a>.</p>
<p>In theory yes I agree. You could also go straight into RacherOS which is supposed to be also very low in footprint. </p>
<p>I use Ubuntu/Debian as base mostly cause those are my preferred flavors and I know in and out how to manage them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by c.monty		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[c.monty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 11:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi,
the footprint of LXC base Debian/Ubuntu is relativ large compared to Alpine Linux. Therefore I would prefer to install Docker / Rancher in a LXC based on Alpine.
What do you think?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
the footprint of LXC base Debian/Ubuntu is relativ large compared to Alpine Linux. Therefore I would prefer to install Docker / Rancher in a LXC based on Alpine.<br />
What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Ubuntu: How to get XenCenter running under Wine and connect to a Xenserver by Andreas Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/linux/linux-ubuntu/ubuntu-how-to-get-xencenter-running-under-wine-and-connect-to-a-xenserver/#comment-434</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=2493#comment-434</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/linux/linux-ubuntu/ubuntu-how-to-get-xencenter-running-under-wine-and-connect-to-a-xenserver/#comment-387&quot;&gt;Andreas Schmidt&lt;/a&gt;.

Again, this was some time ago. but I feel so sorry when I&#039;m spot on right. 
If you follow the XenServer development you realise the strive for irrelevance. 
Yes, developers want to be paid, but how Citrix like to compete with far more superior hypervisors by removing the good features if beyond any common sense. &quot;Xenserver is considerably dead&quot;
https://xenserver.org/blog/entry/xenserver-7-3-changes-to-the-free-edition.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/linux/linux-ubuntu/ubuntu-how-to-get-xencenter-running-under-wine-and-connect-to-a-xenserver/#comment-387">Andreas Schmidt</a>.</p>
<p>Again, this was some time ago. but I feel so sorry when I&#8217;m spot on right.<br />
If you follow the XenServer development you realise the strive for irrelevance.<br />
Yes, developers want to be paid, but how Citrix like to compete with far more superior hypervisors by removing the good features if beyond any common sense. &#8220;Xenserver is considerably dead&#8221;<br />
<a href="https://xenserver.org/blog/entry/xenserver-7-3-changes-to-the-free-edition.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://xenserver.org/blog/entry/xenserver-7-3-changes-to-the-free-edition.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by Andreas Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-433</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-431&quot;&gt;muzzol&lt;/a&gt;.

No I cant really confirm that behavior. 
including latest update from tonight it works well. 
Rancher100 is my modified container
 https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48a124f6edb3cb57120fc56f58231b4cca233e853dc262aec3e5918e3c03b41c.png]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-431">muzzol</a>.</p>
<p>No I cant really confirm that behavior.<br />
including latest update from tonight it works well.<br />
Rancher100 is my modified container<br />
 <a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48a124f6edb3cb57120fc56f58231b4cca233e853dc262aec3e5918e3c03b41c.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48a124f6edb3cb57120fc56f58231b4cca233e853dc262aec3e5918e3c03b41c.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by Andreas Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-432</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Nov 2017 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48a124f6edb3cb57120fc56f58231b4cca233e853dc262aec3e5918e3c03b41c.png  

No I cant really confirm that behavior. 
including latest update from tonight it works well. 
Rancher100 is my modified container]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48a124f6edb3cb57120fc56f58231b4cca233e853dc262aec3e5918e3c03b41c.png" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48a124f6edb3cb57120fc56f58231b4cca233e853dc262aec3e5918e3c03b41c.png</a>  </p>
<p>No I cant really confirm that behavior.<br />
including latest update from tonight it works well.<br />
Rancher100 is my modified container</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by muzzol		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-431</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[muzzol]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 09:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-431</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[on my proxmox frontend CT appears as stopped (greyed out) even when started.
this only happens when I modify conf file with your proposed settings.
have you faced this problem?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on my proxmox frontend CT appears as stopped (greyed out) even when started.<br />
this only happens when I modify conf file with your proposed settings.<br />
have you faced this problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on RedHat 6.x / Centos 6.x: How to install in WordPress in less than 10 minutes by Denis Howe		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/linux/redhat-centos-how-to-install-in-wordpress-in-less-than-10-minutes/#comment-428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denis Howe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2017 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/WP-Cookbook/?p=708#comment-428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks very much for this, it really helped.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks very much for this, it really helped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by Andreas Schmidt		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andreas Schmidt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-426&quot;&gt;Adrew Pro&lt;/a&gt;.

This is strictly a &quot;why? Because I can&quot; scenario and has any sort of security excluded. 

This solution is only as secure as docker is in particular under LXC.
I use docker as a test platform and would never put it into production public web as i think security in docker is assumed.

2 controversial statements below, have a look and consider for yourself. 

https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/106860/can-a-root-user-inside-a-docker-lxc-break-the-security-of-the-whole-system

https://www.slideshare.net/jpetazzo/is-it-safe-to-run-applications-in-linux-containers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-426">Adrew Pro</a>.</p>
<p>This is strictly a &#8220;why? Because I can&#8221; scenario and has any sort of security excluded. </p>
<p>This solution is only as secure as docker is in particular under LXC.<br />
I use docker as a test platform and would never put it into production public web as i think security in docker is assumed.</p>
<p>2 controversial statements below, have a look and consider for yourself. </p>
<p><a href="https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/106860/can-a-root-user-inside-a-docker-lxc-break-the-security-of-the-whole-system" rel="nofollow ugc">https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/106860/can-a-root-user-inside-a-docker-lxc-break-the-security-of-the-whole-system</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.slideshare.net/jpetazzo/is-it-safe-to-run-applications-in-linux-containers" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.slideshare.net/jpetazzo/is-it-safe-to-run-applications-in-linux-containers</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Proxmox / LXC &#8211; Running docker inside a container by Adrew Pro		</title>
		<link>https://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/virtualisation/proxmox/proxmox-lxc-running-docker-inside-container/#comment-426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adrew Pro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solaris-cookbook.eu/?p=3907#comment-426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But what about security?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what about security?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
